|
| |
Headlines:
News
Archive
|
U.S.
Supreme Court declines to hear Miss. death penalty case where defendant seen
shackled by jurors during death penalty phase of trial
The Associated Press
JACKSON — The U.S. Supreme
Court on Monday declined to hear the appeal of a Mississippi death row inmate
who had claimed that his appearance in a George County courtroom in shackles
tainted prospective jurors.
The Mississippi Supreme Court
had upheld Fred Sanford Spicer Jr.’s conviction in January. The Mississippi
court sided with the trial judge who determined that any glimpse that
prospective jurors got of Spicer was accidental and did not prejudice the case.
Spicer was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death in 2003.
Defense attorneys had argued the U.S. Supreme Court had found it is
unconstitutional to force capital murder defendants to appear before juries in
shackles during the penalty phase of trial. That decision came in a Missouri
case.
The nation’s high court said shackling almost always implies that authorities
consider the offender a danger to the community, a factor juries weigh in
considering a sentence, Spicer had argued on appeal.
Spicer was arrested in 2001 after he was stopped in Pascagoula while driving a
vehicle registered to a man found dead at his home. Authorities said a deputy
discovered the body of Edmond Herbert, 42, also of George County, when he went
to the man’s house to ask why Spicer had his vehicle. The two men lived
together, prosecutors said.
Prosecutors said Spicer killed Herbert by striking him in the head with a sword
while Herbert was sleeping.
Spicer had argued that he was brought into the courtroom in civilian clothes and
with leg, arm and waist restraints.
When the defense complained, the trial judge concluded the incident was
unintentional and those in the courtroom got only a fleeting glimpse of the
restraints, prosecutors said.
Critics of restraints contend that prosecutors try to misuse them to scare
juries into sentencing people to death. Supporters contend that defendants can
be dangerous — especially if they already know they’re facing at a minimum
life behind bars.
The Mississippi Supreme Court said Spicer failed to prove that any short glimpse
of him in shackles turned the jury against him.
The Mississippi court said the U.S. Supreme Court clearly said that “being
shackled during an entire proceeding, as opposed to being briefly and
inadvertently seen entering the courtroom in shackles, is what the Constitution
forbids.”
“In the present case, potential jurors possibly observed Spicer shackled in
his brief walk of approximately six feet, from the back entrance of the
courtroom to the witness room. That would not require a mistrial,” the
Mississippi court said.
U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear Miss. death penalty case - The Clarion-Ledger
|
|
Yates
appeals death sentence, cites Ridgway plea agreement
Monday, November 20, 2006 ·
Last updated 11:38 a.m. PT
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
SPOKANE, Wash. -- Convicted serial killer Robert
Yates Jr. points to a more notorious serial killer in arguing that his Pierce
County death sentence should be overturned.
Lawyers for Yates, sentenced to death in Pierce
County for killing two women, contend capital punishment is unfair. They point
to Green River serial killer Gary Ridgway, who got life in prison despite
confessing to killing at least 48 women.
The Washington Supreme Court is scheduled to hear
arguments in the appeal Nov. 30.
Yates was sentenced to 408 years in prison in
2000 after confessing to 13 killings in a plea deal with Spokane County
prosecutors that included information on the Pierce County deaths.
Pierce County moved separately to charge Yates.
He was convicted of killing two women in that county and sentenced to death in
2002.
In seeking to overturn his Pierce County
sentence, Yates' lawyers allege he was misled by Spokane County Prosecutor Steve
Tucker into believing that the two Tacoma-area slayings were part of his Spokane
plea agreement.
It wasn't, Pierce County argued.
A key part of his appeal is that Yates, 54,
didn't get the death penalty in Spokane, despite a larger number of victims.
"Mr. Yates' (death) sentence is arbitrary,
wanton ... freakish and random in light of his Spokane County sentence,"
his lawyers argued in court documents.
The court in April narrowly upheld the death
sentence of a man who fatally stabbed his wife and two children. That case also
pointed to the disparity with Ridgway's sentence.
In that 5-4 case, the court acknowledged the
extraordinary circumstances of Ridgway's case, but said no matter how unfair it
may seem, his plea deal does not automatically invalidate the state's death
penalty for everyone else.
Yates' lawyers also argue that he should serve
the Pierce County sentence only after he completes the Spokane sentence. In
other words, his execution should wait until after he's served the 408 years.
Yates, an aluminum smelter worker and Air
National Guard helicopter pilot, was arrested in Spokane in April 2000 after
years of unsolved deaths of local women, many of whom were prostitutes.
Within weeks of his arrest, Yates' public
defender was trying for a plea agreement with Tucker. Through the lawyer, Yates
started revealing information about his victims and his crimes.
Tucker has repeatedly said he thought he had
then-Pierce County Prosecutor John Ladenburg's permission to include the two
Pierce County cases in the plea deal.
Ladenburg has said he told Tucker in a conference
call that a plea deal was "ill-considered and premature" and to leave
the Pierce County cases out of any deal that didn't include the death penalty.
Tucker said he has no recollection of Ladenburg
saying that.
Shortly after Tucker sent the proposed plea deal
to Ladenburg, Yates was charged with the Pierce County homicides.
"By filing the cases in Pierce County, Mr.
Ladenburg took public jurisdiction and control over what was rightfully
his," the county's current prosecutor, Gerald Horne, wrote to the high
court.
Washington state is one of 38 states with the
death penalty, and has executed four people since the U.S. Supreme Court cleared
the way for capital punishment in 1976.
Seattle Post-Intelligencer, http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420AP_WA_Death_Sentence.html
The Spokesman-Review, http://www.spokesmanreview.com
|
|
Wash.
Supreme Court overturns murderer's death penalty
By Curt Woodward, The Associated Press
The state Supreme Court overturned a convicted
murderer's death penalty today, saying evidence from his rescinded rape
convictions and a prosecutor's misconduct require a new sentence.
The 8-1 ruling came in the consolidated case of
Allen Eugene Gregory, who appealed his convictions for rape in 2000 and his
aggravated murder conviction from 2001.
The majority, led by Justice Bobbe Bridge,
overturned the rape convictions, saying the trial judge should have considered
evidence that may have helped Gregory's defense.
The justices then threw out Gregory's death
sentence, saying evidence of the rapes influenced his sentencing for murder. The
court also said it would have overturned the death sentence anyway, because the
prosecutor committed misconduct by improperly suggesting life in prison was too
lenient for Gregory.
Gregory's murder conviction was sent back to
Pierce County Superior Court for resentencing. He was originally sentenced in
May 2001 for the rape, robbery and killing of Geneine Ann Harshfield, a neighbor
in Tacoma's Hilltop area.
Gregory had been a suspect in the death of
Harshfield, 43, who was stabbed in her home after she returned home from her
bartending job in July 1996. But the murder went unsolved for two years, until
police drew Gregory's blood for evidence after his arrest in the separate rape
case.
Tacoma police matched Gregory's DNA to semen
stains from Harshfield's bed and her body.
Justices Richard Sanders and Mary Fairhurst
agreed with the Supreme Court's result, but said they differed on the reasoning.
Justice Jim Johnson dissented from the ruling, writing that the ruling
"comes in total disregard of Washington's victims of crimes rights."
The Seattle Times Wash. Supreme Court overturns murderer's death penalty
|
|
Naveed
Haq won't face death penalty
Jewish
Federation shooting victims support decision
Thursday,
December 21, 2006
By
Tracy Johnson, Seattle P-I
Two
women who nearly lost their lives when a man burst into a
Seattle
Jewish charity and started shooting said they were glad the suspect would not
face the death penalty.
The
son and daughter of the woman who died in the July 28 rampage suggested a death
sentence might be deserved, but they vowed not to think about the man or his
fate.
King
County Prosecutor Norm Maleng said Wednesday that he would not seek execution
for Naveed Haq, accused of killing one woman and wounding five others at the
Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle while ranting about Jewish people.
Maleng
called the shooting "one of the most serious crimes that has ever occurred
in this city" but said Haq's long history of mental illness is a reason for
leniency.
The
only other possible sentence is life in prison.
The
grown children of Pamela Waechter, who was the charity's annual campaign
director when she was killed, said Haq's "cruel and callous disregard for
the lives of so many, in our view, forfeited his right to preserve his
own."
But
in their written statement, Nicole and Mark Waechter said they respected
Maleng's decision and would not dwell on it -- or on Haq.
"We
choose instead to spend our energies trying to mend our lives in a way that
honors our mother and all she meant to us," they said. "We need all of
our energies to heal our wounds and those of others."
Cheryl
Stumbo and Layla Bush, who are still recovering from gunshot wounds, said they
didn't believe in the death penalty -- although the crime made each of them
rethink their position from the painful perspective of a victim.
"The
death penalty most likely promulgates further violence and thoughts of
revenge," Stumbo said.
Bush,
who has the longest road to recovery and only recently began to walk again with
the help of a cane, said she believed a life sentence would be a tougher
punishment than execution.
"I
think this guy is someone who could feel remorse in prison," she said.
"Two wrongs don't make a right."
The
Jewish Federation has no formal stance on the death penalty. Officials will
focus on the recovery of the victims and follow the court case " to make
sure each woman's spirit and energy are in the courtroom every day," said
Robin Boehler, chairwoman of the federation.
Haq,
who is from the Tri-Cities and has a degree in electrical engineering, faces
nine criminal charges: aggravated murder, five counts of attempted murder,
kidnapping, burglary and malicious harassment -- a hate crime.
His
attorney, C. Wesley Richards, said he would now begin exploring other aspects of
the case, including what role Haq's mental illness would play in his defense.
"I
am pleased that Mr. Maleng recognized that Mr. Haq has a serious mental illness
and, accordingly, that the death penalty is not appropriate," Richards
said.
Haq's
parents have been supportive of their son, Richards said. In a written statement
soon after the shooting, the couple expressed shock about what happened and
offered condolences and prayers for the victims and their families.
Acquaintances
have said Haq struggles with bipolar disorder, which generally is characterized
by drastic mood swings. In court documents, defense attorneys said Haq has
"extensive medication and mental health issues" and has sought
treatment from more than one place during the past decade.
Before
making his decision, Maleng reviewed Haq's treatment records and the opinions of
mental health experts hired by Haq's attorneys.
In
the past 10 years, Maleng, a Republican entering his eighth term, has considered
whether to seek execution for 31 people and has sought it for three, according
to a P-I analysis of the cases. It takes a unanimous jury to impose it. He has
spared several suspects who were clearly mentally ill -- a factor to be
considered under state law.
Deputy
Prosecutor Don Raz said he hoped to bring Haq to trial by the end of 2007.
On
Wednesday, two of the shooting victims and a crowd of other Jewish Federation
employees came to a brief King County Superior Court hearing for Haq, a stocky
man who wore glasses, a wrinkled dress shirt and khaki pants and was accompanied
by four officers.
"He's
a lot smaller than I remember him being," Stumbo said after the hearing.
"A gun makes a person look bigger."
P-I
reporter Tracy Johnson can be reached at 206-467-5942 or tracyjohnson@seattlepi.com.
|
|
Italy
calls for worldwide death penalty moratorium
Wednesday Jan 3 08:18 AEDT
AP -
Italy
has begun a diplomatic push at the United Nations to put its drive for a
worldwide moratorium on the death penalty on the international body's agenda,
following a wave of denunciations across
Europe
over Saddam Hussein's execution.
In
New York
,
Italy
's ambassador to the UN met with the head of mission for
Russia
, which currently holds the UN Security Council presidency, to explain its
determination to have the issue taken up by the UN General Assembly, the Italian
Foreign Ministry said.
Italian Prime Minister Romano
Prodi's office said
Italy
would seek the support of other countries that oppose capital punishment in its
drive.
On Sunday, Italian Foreign
Minister Massimo D'Alema said his country would work for the end of the death
penalty worldwide following denunciations across Europe of Saddam's hanging.
Past lobbying by
Italy
for UN action against the death penalty has been unsuccessful.
Italy
is now one of the rotating members of the UN Security Council.
Saddam's execution by hanging
on Saturday was denounced virtually across
Italy
's political spectrum, with former premier and conservative opposition leader
Silvio Berlusconi calling the killing a political error and centre-left leader
Prodi expressing worry that the execution will fuel more violence in
Iraq
.
Italy
and all other European Union countries do not permit capital punishment.
The
Foreign Ministry said
Italy
had asked
Germany
, which now holds the rotating EU presidency, to hold a discussion on the death
penalty during an EU political meeting on January 11-12 in
Dresden
,
Germany/
|
|
Prosecutor
considers seeking first post-Ridgway death penalty
By Gene Johnson, The Associated Press
SEATTLE – Lawmakers who enacted Washington's
death-penalty law 25 years ago had cases like Conner Schierman's in mind: a
young mother, a young aunt and two little boys stabbed to death, their house
burned to conceal the crimes, all while the family's father served in Iraq.
But whether Schierman might face execution if
convicted is far from certain. King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng has not sought
capital punishment in the past three years — ever since he famously agreed to
a plea deal that spared the life of the Green River serial killer, Gary Ridgway,
in exchange for help finding more remains of his victims. Many lawyers wonder if
he will ever seek the death penalty again against lesser murderers.
Maleng has sought the death penalty 17 times, or
in about one-quarter of death-eligible cases, over the past 25 years.
Through his spokesman, Maleng declined to be
interviewed, noting that his decision in the Schierman case is due by the end of
the month.
"Maleng's in a difficult position,"
said Eric Lindell, one of the lawyers who represented Ridgway. "Every time
you hear of a case where he doesn't go death, people say, 'Well, he's not going
to after Ridgway.' But he's never come out and said that. At some point, you've
got to be afraid that he might."
Maleng's decision also comes at an interesting
time for the death penalty in Washington. The state Supreme Court upheld the law
5-4 last year, in a case that questioned how prosecutors can execute anyone if
they're not going to execute Ridgway. A new state bar association report raises
questions about the wisdom of continuing to seek execution, given the exorbitant
costs of such trials and the overwhelming likelihood of reversal by appeals
courts.
And the elected prosecutor of Pierce County,
which has sought the death penalty more than any other Washington county, called
the state's experience with capital punishment "a farce" in an
interview and suggested that the law is so ineffective it should be abolished.
"It doesn't matter how overwhelming the
evidence is. Everyone does their damnedest to give a fair trial ... and the
appellate courts reverse it every time," Pierce County Prosecutor Gerry
Horne said. "You say, 'What kind of steward am I of the public resources,
if I know that's going to happen and I seek the death penalty anyway?'
"Why do we even go through the charade? If
they're never going to invoke the death penalty, the Legislature should do away
with it."
Schierman has pleaded not guilty to aggravated
first-degree murder. Prosecutors say he told police that he woke up covered in
blood in the Kirkland home of National Guard Sgt. Leonid Milkin after an
alcoholic blackout last July, and that he burned the house to conceal his
crimes. Milkin's wife, sister-in-law and sons, ages 3 and 5, had been stabbed to
death.
Schierman, 25, has no criminal record, is
relatively young and reportedly had battled alcohol problems, which could be
considered mitigating factors that might spare him the death penalty. But the
facts of the case are heinous. Schierman lawyer Jim Conroy declined to discuss
what evidence he had asked Maleng to consider in making his death-penalty
decision.
Though not all potential mitigating facts have
been publicly revealed, some lawyers who have been watching the case believe
Schierman's circumstances are less persuasive than, say, the long history of
mental illness that Maleng cited when he declined to seek the death penalty last
month against Naveed Haq, who is accused of shooting six people at Seattle's
Jewish Federation.
"Mr. Maleng has always been very careful in
his evaluation of the facts of the crime and any offered mitigation," said
Jeff Ellis, president of the Washington Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty.
"He does not make political decisions. He makes very careful personal
decisions, based on the facts of the case."
Ellis served with other defense attorneys,
prosecutors and retired judges on a Washington State Bar Association subcommitte
that issued a report last month on the death penalty in Washington state. The
report said the question of whether the death penalty is practical is best left
to lawmakers and voters, but also noted that the state has spent millions of
dollars pursuing death in 79 cases over the last 25 years, with four executions
to show for it. Three of the convicts excecuted had waived their appeals and
volunteered to be killed.
|
Death
penalty sought for accused quadruple murderer
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/301708_schier30ww.html
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
By TRACY JOHNSON
P-I REPORTER
King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng is seeking the
death penalty for a man accused of stabbing two women and two young boys, then
setting their Kirkland house on fire.
Maleng's decision was announced today in a
Superior Court hearing for Conner Schierman, a 25-year-old hotel maintenance
worker who lived across the street from the victims.
Army National Guard Sgt. Leonid Milkin, who was
serving in Iraq when his family was killed on July 17, said he believed it was
the right choice.
"It's not just a tragedy - there is a person
behind this," Milkin said. "Four beautiful people have been
murdered."
If Schierman is found guilty of aggravated
murder, it would be up to a jury to decide whether he should live or die. A
death sentence must be unanimous.
In court documents, Maleng, who has now sought
the death penalty in four of 31 aggravated murder cases in the past decade,
wrote that there was not sufficient reason for leniency.
Deputy Prosecutor Scott O'Toole said Maleng
firmly believes it's a decision for a jury of 12 people to make.
Schierman's attorney, James Conroy, said he would
challenge whether Washington's death penalty is constitutional and whether
Maleng - or any prosecutor - should be able "to pick and choose who they
decide to seek the death penalty for." He said Schierman's family was taken
aback by the news.
A trial is set for March 26, but most expect the
date to be delayed. Another hearing is set for Thursday.
Superior Court Judge Greg Canova revoked
Schierman's bail, which was already set at $10 million. Schierman remains in
King County Jail.
Schierman is charged with four counts of
aggravated murder and one count of arson for the July 17 deaths of Olga Milkin,
28; her sister, Lyubov Botvina, 24; and the Milkins' two sons, Justin, 5, and
Andrew, 3.
A motive remains unclear. Schierman told police
he drank too much vodka, blacked out and awakened to find himself covered in
blood in the victims' home, according to court documents.
It will be the first time Maleng's office has
asked a jury to sentence someone to die since the trial of Kevin Cruz, who
killed two men and wounded two others in a 1999 shooting at Seattle's Northlake
Shipyard.
Jurors, who heard Cruz had mental health issues,
spared his life.
The Schierman case is also the first time Maleng
has sought capital punishment since he allowed Green River serial killer Gary
Ridgway to trade details about killing 48 women for his life. Ridgway pleaded
guilty and is serving life in prison.
The plea deal raised questions about whether
anyone could fairly be executed when Ridgway escaped that fate, but the state
Supreme Court narrowly upheld Washington's death penalty law last year.
Maleng has sought execution in roughly a quarter
of his office's aggravated-murder cases since the current death penalty law was
enacted in 1981.
Tracy Johnson can be reached at 206-467-5942
or tracyjohnson@seattlepi.com.
|
|