Dec05 to Feb06 News
Home ] Up ]
  




Headlines:

News Archive

12 Years After Execution, Evidence of Innocence
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, November 22, 2005

HOUSTON, Nov. 21 (AP) - Doubts are being cast on the guilt of a San Antonio man executed in 1993. The questions were raised after the only witness to the crime recanted and a co-defendant said he had allowed the man to be falsely accused under police pressure, The Houston Chronicle reported Sunday.

The executed man, Ruben Cantu, was 17 in 1984 when he was charged with capital murder in the fatal shooting of a man in an attempted robbery. The victim was shot nine times with a rifle before the gunman fired more bullets into the only witness.

That witness, Juan Moreno, told The Chronicle that it was not Mr. Cantu who shot him. Mr. Moreno said he identified Mr. Cantu as the killer at his 1985 trial because he felt pressured and was afraid of the authorities.

Mr. Cantu's co-defendant, David Garza, recently signed an affidavit saying that he had allowed Mr. Cantu, a friend, to be accused, even though Mr. Cantu was not with him the night of the killing. Mr. Garza, who is serving time in prison for an unrelated robbery, said years of guilt prompted his effort to clear his dead friend's name, The Chronicle reported. Mr. Cantu was executed at age 26. He had long professed his innocence.

Mr. Garza, who was 15 at the time of the killing, tried to help Mr. Cantu about a month before his execution, sending a letter to his friend's lawyer that read: "This case with Ruben is real messed up ... Hope to hear from you real soon," The Chronicle reported. The lawyer, Nancy Barohn, said that the letter included no details and that Mr. Cantu never told her that Mr. Garza had information that could help him.

"Part of me died when he died," Mr. Garza said. "You've got a 17-year-old who went to his grave for something he did not do."

Miriam Ward, the forewoman of the jury that convicted Mr. Cantu, said the panel's decision was the best it could do based on the information presented at the trial.

"With a little extra work, a little extra effort, maybe we'd have gotten the right information," Ms. Ward said. "The bottom line is, an innocent person was put to death for it. We all have our finger in that."

Sam D. Millsap Jr., who as Bexar County district attorney decided to charge Mr. Cantu with capital murder, told the newspaper that he never should have sought the death penalty in a case based on testimony from a witness who identified a suspect only after the police showed him Mr. Cantu's photograph three times.

On the night of the attack, Mr. Moreno, 19, and his friend Pedro Gomez, 25, were sleeping in a house they were helping to build for Mr. Moreno's brother. They were awakened by two teenagers demanding money. The older of the two carried a .22-caliber rifle. Mr. Gomez was killed; Mr. Moreno was shot but survived.

Sgt. Bill Ewell, now retired, who oversaw the investigation told The Chronicle, "I'm confident the right people were prosecuted."
Massachusetts House defeats attempt to restore the death penalty

by Mark Larrañaga
(11/16/2005)


House lawmakers on Tuesday soundly rejected a bill put forward by Gov. Mitt Romney to restore capital punishment in Massachusetts .

Romney had said the bill had strict safeguards and would seek the death penalty only in "very, very rare circumstances," such as terrorism, serial killing or murdering police officers or other public servants.

But critics said innocent people could still have been put to death.

The House defeated the bill on a 99-to-53 vote. The Senate has not debated the bill.

Romney, who is weighing a Republican presidential run in 2008, said his plan would have set the nation's highest standard of proof for ensuring that only the guilty were executed, using scientific evidence such as DNA and multiple checks and balances, including review by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

But Rep. Eugene O'Flaherty, a Democrat, said scientific evidence presented at trial can sometimes be flawed or misinterpreted.

Some death penalty supporters who voted for the bill said Romney's legislation was too cautious and should also have included those found guilty of first-degree murder or the killing of children.

Supporters said the death penalty would not only deter people from committing murders, but is also fair justice. Without the death penalty, the life of the murderer is given greater value than the life of their victim, supporters said

But opponents said the death penalty is unfairly applied to the poor and racial minorities, is too expensive and runs counter to the worldwide trend. Increasing numbers of countries have abolished capital punishment.

Massachusetts has not executed anyone since 1947. It's one of a dozen states without capital punishment.

-- Mark A. Larrañaga, Law Offices of Walsh & Larrañaga

N. Carolina carries out 1,000th US execution

Reuters -- Fri Dec 2,11:36 AM ET

Double murderer Kenneth Lee Boyd became the 1,000th prisoner executed in the United States since the reinstatement of capital punishment when he was put to death by lethal injection on Friday.

"God bless everybody in here," Boyd said in his last words to witnesses separated from his death chamber by a double-paned glass partition.

Boyd, who was 57, died at 2:15 a.m. (0715 GMT) at Central Prison in North Carolina's state capital, Raleigh, spokeswoman Pamela Walker of the Department of Corrections said.

Boyd, a Vietnam war veteran with a history of alcohol abuse, was sentenced to death for the murder in 1988 of his wife and father-in-law committed in front of two of his children.

His execution drew world attention because of its symbolism since the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the death penalty to be brought back in 1976 after a nine-year unofficial moratorium.

Boyd's lawyer Thomas Maher told reporters the execution had not made the world better or safer.

"This 1,000th execution is a milestone, a milestone we should all be ashamed of," Maher said.

Boyd was wheeled into the death chamber strapped down on a gurney and injected with a fatal mix of three drugs.

He seemed "sort of resigned," said witness Elyse Ashburn. After he spoke his last words and the drugs were injected, "He just looked immediately like he had gone to sleep," she said.

Choking back tears, daughter-in-law Kathy Smith said Boyd "was a very kind man with a good heart. He would have given the shirt off his back to anybody in need." Several of Boyd's relatives also sobbed.

About 100 death-penalty opponents gathered on a sidewalk outside the prison where they held candles and read the names of the other 999 convicts who have been put to death.

DETAINED PROTESTERS

Between 16 and 18 of the protesters were detained shortly before midnight and charged with trespassing after stepping onto prison property, police said. Witnesses said many in the group had been on their knees in prayer on a prison driveway.

"This was a peaceful demonstration. They just violated the rules," said State Capitol Police Chief Scott Hunter.

Reaction around the world to Boyd's death was swift.

"It is a scandal that the death penalty still exists in a civilized country like the United States of America," said Petra Herrmann, chairwoman of the German group Alive e.V.

".... How can a citizen realize that murder is wrong if the state is allowed to murder its own citizens?"

Akiko Takada of Japan's anti-capital punishment group Forum 90 said that despite frequent use of the death penalty in the United States "crime there shows no signs of diminishing, so ultimately the death of these people has no effect."

"This is one small step for humankind -- backwards," American campaigner Clive Stafford Smith told Reuters in London. "The death penalty makes us all far more barbaric ..."

Boyd's last chance of a reprieve ran out less than four hours before his appointment with death when Gov. Mike Easley said he saw no compelling reason to grant clemency.

FINAL MEAL

In his final few hours, he ate a last meal of steak, baked potato and salad and met his family for the last time.

The first convict to be executed after the death penalty returned to the United States, Gary Gilmore, died in front a firing squad in Utah on January 17, 1977, after ordering his lawyers to drop all appeals.

Thirty-eight of the 50 U.S. states and the federal government permit capital punishment and only China, Iran and Vietnam held more executions in 2004 than the United States, according to rights group Amnesty International.

But while the death penalty retains support with a clear majority of Americans, the number of executions has fallen sharply in recent years, and was down to 59 last year.

"If you were starting from scratch, my guess is nobody would think that the death penalty is a great idea," said Duke University law professor Jim Coleman, a campaigner against capital punishment.

Singapore, which has the world's highest execution rate relative to population, also carried out a death penalty on Friday with the hanging of Australian drugs trafficker Nguyen Tuong Van despite Australian government pleas for clemency.

South Carolina was scheduled to execute another American, Shawn Paul Humphries, by lethal injection at 6 p.m. (2300 GMT) on Friday for the killing of a convenience store owner in a robbery.

Saturday, Dec. 3, 5:00 to 7:00PM

Vigil marks the 1,000th U.S. execution
since 1976 death penalty reinstatement

A candlelight vigil at the Washington State Capitol will commemorate the 1,000th person to be executed in the U.S. since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976.  The vigil will be held on Saturday, December 3rd from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. in Olympia on the western half of the State Capitol steps.

We invite you to participate for the full two hours, or for as much of this time as you can.  You may stand, sit on the steps, or bring chairs.

The vigil’s organizers will provide 1,000 small candles in clear plastic cups and will arrange them so as to protect the marble steps from any wax drippings.  Please use the candles provided; do not bring your own.

In the 1972 Furman v. Georgia case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was being applied in such arbitrary and capricious ways that racial disparities and other injustices had become rampant.  States (including Washington) rewrote their laws to tighten up the sentencing criteria and procedures.  In the 1976 Gregg v. Georgia case, the U.S. Supreme Court approved the new methods.  Although death penalty cases have become much more complex and expensive since then, so many inconsistencies and biases are still inherent in the death penalty process that racial and other injustices persist.  The Supreme Court has accepted many of these injustices as routine aspects of our nation’s criminal justice system.

The vigil is sponsored by the Washington Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (WCADP), P.O. Box 3045, Seattle WA  98114, (206) 622-8952 (info@abolishdeathpenalty.org or www.abolishdeathpenalty.org) and the Olympia Fellowship of Reconciliation's (FOR) Committee for Alternatives to the Death Penalty.

For additional information contact Glen Anderson at (260) 491-9093.

Time is short!  Please spread the word quickly!

Federal court throws out killer's death sentence:
Potential juror unfairly excluded, judges say

Friday, December 9, 2005

By SAM SKOLNIK
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

A federal appeals court overturned the death sentence Thursday of a man who had been expected to be the next person executed in Washington.

The three-judge panel concluded that the King County judge in the case of Cal Coburn Brown had unconstitutionally excluded a potential juror who had expressed some reservations about the death penalty.

In 1991, Brown carjacked 21-year-old Holly Washa and drove her to a hotel near Sea-Tac Airport. He held her hostage and raped and tortured her there for two days. He left her to bleed to death in a parking lot.

Brown, 47, turned himself in after he raped and tried to kill another woman in Palm Springs, Calif. He admitted to both crimes. In 1993, a King County jury convicted him and sentenced him to die.

But three judges of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously found that at least one of the bases for Brown's appeal, regarding the selection of the jury in his case, was valid.

Brown's defense lawyers argued that prosecutors had erroneously objected to three potential jurors being removed during jury selection because they were against the death penalty. In two of the cases, the appeals judges said, the jurors should have been excluded.

But in the case of a man identified as "Juror Z," the judges found that although he agreed that such mitigating factors as childhood trauma or mental illness could be taken into account when deciding a death case, he had "expressed no antipathy toward the death penalty" and had been removed from the panel unfairly.

King County Superior Court Judge Ricardo Martinez presided at his trial. He is now a U.S. District Court judge in Seattle.

Martinez imposed the jury's death sentence in what he called at the time "one of the most horrible, most brutal crimes" he had seen in his years as a prosecutor and judge.

On Thursday, state Assistant Attorney General John Samson expressed disappointment that the death sentence may not stand. Samson, who argued the case on appeal, said the appeals judges had applied incorrect legal standards when reviewing the claim.

Samson said the state likely will appeal the ruling to the full, nine-judge appeals court, and to the Supreme Court if necessary. If the state loses all its appeals, another King County jury would be chosen to sentence Brown a second time.

The appeals judges were "just reaffirming that the state can't use the jury selection process to stack the jury in favor of death," said Brown's attorney, Suzanne Lee Elliott of Seattle. She added that Juror Z seemed exactly like the type of fair-minded person citizens should want on a death penalty jury.

The appeals panel did not address one of Brown's other appeals claims: that his trial lawyers had not argued strenuously enough that he was mentally ill and off his medication at the time of Washa's murder.

Brother's nightmares come to end after forgiving sister's murderer
Meeting cools sting in heart, Man no longer believes in death penalty after seeing change in Glenn Benner II
Beacon Journal staff writer

For years, Rodney Bowser spewed raw hate for Glenn Benner II, the man who raped and killed his beloved little sister.

``I couldn't even hear his name without going grrrrrrr,'' Bowser said in an interview Thursday at his Tallmadge home. He clenched his fists to emphasize the hatred.

But all that has changed.

It happened after the two met at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility in Lucasville shortly before Benner was executed last week.

Rodney Bowser calls this ``the most bizarre ending'' he could imagine.

Bowser, a 48-year-old machinist, spent two decades cursing the former childhood friend who killed his 21-year-old sister, Trina, a wholesome and pretty secretary, in 1986.

He and his parents, Joyce and Willard Bowser, and his three older brothers spent years tracking the Benner case's torturous progress through the courts. They couldn't wait for Benner to die; they begged Gov. Bob Taft not to grant him any leniency.

Rodney Bowser was so overcome at Benner's clemency hearing in January that he couldn't make his remarks. Instead, he covered his face with his hands and wept.

Questions answered

But he didn't want Benner, 43, to go to his grave without answering questions about Trina's death, clearing up mysteries that baffled police and family alike.

Foremost was this: When Trina left a girlfriend's house in Stow at 10 p.m. on Jan. 1, 1986, to go home, what happened in the next two hours?

A little after midnight on that snowy night, passersby spotted Trina's car ablaze, parked on the berm of Interstate 76. Rodney and his parents opened the trunk to find Trina's naked body, her fake fur coat covering her torso and underpants covering her face.

That horrid picture would flash over and over in Rodney Bowser's mind.

In the final weeks before Benner's execution on Feb. 7, the Bowser family tried to set up a meeting with Trina's killer to fill in the lost two hours. Rodney, closest in age to Benner, was drafted for the job.

The first meeting at the Ohio State Penitentiary in Youngstown on Jan. 30 didn't happen.

Benner, then housed there, got angry over unrelated issues, an official told Bowser.

But on the night before his execution, right after he had said goodbye to 17 family members and friends, Benner made a phone call to Rodney Bowser. It was the first time the two had talked in 20 years.

The call lasted for about 20 minutes. They agreed to meet the next morning, minutes before Benner would die.

But Benner wasn't sure officials would permit that. The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction had never allowed a member of a victim's family to meet with a prisoner in the death house, the spartan building at the Lucasville prison in which all executions take place.

So Benner called Rodney Bowser back for a second talk -- just in case. This one lasted 90 minutes.

They talked about their lives. They'd grown up two houses from each other -- Bowser in Tallmadge and Benner in Springfield Township. They'd played bows and arrows together.

Benner talked about how he hated prison. He implied that he had faced almost as much violence in prison as he had doled out on the outside. He said this was no way to live.

They talked about the awful details of Trina's death.

``Don't sugar-coat it,'' Bowser said he told Benner. ``Give it to me straight.''

Bowser won't repeat those details, except to say that Benner and Trina met accidentally at a Lawson's store. Benner was buying cigarettes; Trina pulled in the parking lot and approached him, not knowing he had raped and killed Cynthia Sedgwick, 26, of Cleveland Heights the previous August. Trina knew him from the neighborhood. She was just being friendly.

Meeting face-to-face

About an hour after Benner and Rodney Bowser had their second phone conversation, Rodney was in the car, headed as planned to the Lucasville prison in southern Ohio.

His confidence buckled when he walked into the death house early in the morning on Feb. 7 for his person-to-person talk with Benner, who was scheduled to die at 10 a.m.

``I almost backed out,'' he recalled. ``I was shaking like a leaf.''

Major David Warren, the prison's head of security, was dubious. Before he let the two meet, he sat Bowser down. Stay calm, he warned him. Keep Benner calm.

Prison officials didn't want to have to drag an upset Benner to his execution, Andrea Dean, spokeswoman for the Ohio prison system explained this week.

So Benner and Bowser talked in low voices through the jail bars. They went back over the same topics covered in the phone calls. About 10 members of Benner's execution team stood just out of earshot.

Bowser said Benner didn't know why he killed. He didn't blame marijuana and alcohol, his companions since age 12.

`` `All my friends did those, and they didn't end up killing anybody,' '' Bowser quoted Benner as saying.

They called each other by their childhood nicknames -- ``Bimbo'' for Benner and ``Rodney Man'' for Bowser.

Bowser clocked their talk, which began at 8 a.m., at 17 minutes -- two minutes over the limit. They were calm. There were tears. They shook hands.

After that, Bowser was so overcome with emotion he gave up his execution witness seat to one of his brothers. He didn't want to see it happen. More surprising, he didn't want it to happen at all.

``I didn't want to deal with it,'' Bowser said, ``and I didn't want to take away from what the rest of the family wanted.''

At 8:55 a.m., he called Benner back. He was told that Benner was being readied for his execution and couldn't talk. But his spiritual advisor passed on Bowser's message -- that Bowser forgave him.

About an hour later, just before he died, Benner publicly apologized to the Bowser and Sedgwick families. He called Trina and Cynthia ``beautiful girls who didn't deserve what I done to them.''

A changed man

As Rodney Bowser sees it, by the time of his death Benner was a changed man. He had become religious. He wanted the Bowser family -- and especially Rodney -- to learn what they wanted to know. Though Benner didn't attend his own clemency hearing, he did see news reports and read the transcript of the remarks that Bowser was too overcome to deliver. Bowser knows that because Benner talked about those remarks.

Since Benner's death, Bowser has compared the known facts about Trina's death with what Benner told him. Bowser has concluded that Benner told the truth.

Rodney Bowser also has shared Benner's story with his parents -- as much as they wanted to hear, that is.

A weight has been lifted. Rodney Bowser doesn't have nightmares any more.

He doesn't believe in the death penalty anymore, either. A life sentence for Benner would have been just fine, he says now. People can change, he now believes.

After all, his sister's killer did.